From 35475bb00a692419e956e1a3528edcd13e2c3672 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:29:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] update --- updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn b/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn index eb57168..8735c73 100644 --- a/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn +++ b/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn @@ -111,8 +111,10 @@ simply *implementing* existing RISC-V Standards?", and he replied, "all of them". I then asked, "how many of those projects are *innovating*, developing alternative extensions to what is dictated by the RISC-V Foundation?" With the answer being "none", *that* was the point at which -he understood the extent of the problem, and how the RISC-V Foundation - -and its members - are at risk of violating EU anti-trust legislation. +he understood the extent of the problem, and (with the systematic failure +to respond to in-good-faith requests to participate in innovation), +how the RISC-V Foundation - and its members, by way of them having +"voting power" - are at risk of violating EU anti-trust legislation. oops. -- 2.30.2