From 5d228f6bed0ff1f6d1fd013d9ebe019c316a6ebb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Harlan Lifton Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 21:36:58 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo --- updates/001_2018nov28_why_a_libre_soc.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/updates/001_2018nov28_why_a_libre_soc.mdwn b/updates/001_2018nov28_why_a_libre_soc.mdwn index 47471be..5ca0b67 100644 --- a/updates/001_2018nov28_why_a_libre_soc.mdwn +++ b/updates/001_2018nov28_why_a_libre_soc.mdwn @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ compete with other embedded tablet / smartphone / netbook / IPTV / etc. SoC companies are taking what they can get, doing the best integration job they can, getting it out the door, and moving on to the next product. Samsung actually has two separate teams (one internal, -the other a third party called Nexell) that produce Samung-badged +the other a third party called Nexell) that produce Samsung-badged SoCs on overlapping cycles, as a way to help reduce the risk. The problem for all of these companies is that, apart from some -- 2.30.2