[libre-riscv-dev] Some recent documenting of work performed for tape-out
[libre-riscv-dev.git] / 21 / b20c4511bd36fdf79ac995005e86451f05e0c3
1 Return-path: <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>
2 Envelope-to: publicinbox@libre-riscv.org
3 Delivery-date: Fri, 08 May 2020 11:29:53 +0100
4 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=libre-riscv.org)
5 by libre-soc.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
6 (envelope-from <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>)
7 id 1jX0GO-0000YM-DI; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:29:52 +0100
8 Received: from vps2.stafverhaegen.be ([85.10.201.15])
9 by libre-soc.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
10 (envelope-from <staf@fibraservi.eu>) id 1jX0GM-0000YG-Pu
11 for libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:29:50 +0100
12 Received: from hpdc7800 (hpdc7800 [10.0.0.1])
13 by vps2.stafverhaegen.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DED11C059A
14 for <libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>;
15 Fri, 8 May 2020 12:29:50 +0200 (CEST)
16 Message-ID: <7fcce2dc2715c268c1029783a83ebcd814c489b9.camel@fibraservi.eu>
17 From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu>
18 To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
19 Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 12:29:45 +0200
20 In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDw862-S1=Au1YbsKNy0629pa56eShp+2o_Avd96Auz8mw@mail.gmail.com>
21 References: <CAPweEDw862-S1=Au1YbsKNy0629pa56eShp+2o_Avd96Auz8mw@mail.gmail.com>
22 Organization: FibraServi bvba
23 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-8.el7)
24 Mime-Version: 1.0
25 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23
26 Subject: Re: [libre-riscv-dev] minimum viable ASIC
27 X-BeenThere: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
28 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
29 Precedence: list
30 List-Id: Libre-RISCV General Development
31 <libre-riscv-dev.lists.libre-riscv.org>
32 List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/options/libre-riscv-dev>,
33 <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=unsubscribe>
34 List-Archive: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/>
35 List-Post: <mailto:libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>
36 List-Help: <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=help>
37 List-Subscribe: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev>,
38 <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=subscribe>
39 Reply-To: Libre-RISCV General Development
40 <libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>
41 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2823974124656142798=="
42 Errors-To: libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org
43 Sender: "libre-riscv-dev" <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>
44
45
46 --===============2823974124656142798==
47 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
48 boundary="=-n2C+SGSC3vxgvD5XNQZj"
49
50
51 --=-n2C+SGSC3vxgvD5XNQZj
52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
53 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
54
55 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton schreef op vr 08-05-2020 om 10:50 [+0100]:
56 >=20
57 > * a PLL (this is quite a lot however it turns the ASIC from a 24mhz
58 > design into a 300mhz design)
59
60 Why only 24MHz without PLL ? You should have problems getting external
61 clock frequencies up to 100MHz without a problem inside a chip.
62
63
64 --=-n2C+SGSC3vxgvD5XNQZj--
65
66
67
68 --===============2823974124656142798==
69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
70 MIME-Version: 1.0
71 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
72 Content-Disposition: inline
73
74 X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KbGlicmUtcmlz
75 Y3YtZGV2IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApsaWJyZS1yaXNjdi1kZXZAbGlzdHMubGlicmUtcmlzY3Yub3Jn
76 Cmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5saWJyZS1yaXNjdi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9saWJyZS1yaXNj
77 di1kZXYK
78
79 --===============2823974124656142798==--
80
81
82