+With no transition path there is guaranteed to be tension and conflict
+within the RISC-V Community over whether revisions should be made:
+should existing legacy designs be prioritised, mutually-exclusively over
+future designs (and what happens during the transition period is absolute
+chaos). If several overlapping revisions are required that have not
+yet transitioned out of use (which could take well over two decades to
+occur) the situation becomes disastrous for the credibility of RISC-V.
+