(no commit message)

diff --git a/nlnet_2022_opf_isa_wg/discussion.mdwn b/nlnet_2022_opf_isa_wg/discussion.mdwn
index 69613f2ccb39ba6246a0e3bab62bcf49a7c416a4..34c3a0aab6c8b86d9843e8e92ef550da3df9388d 100644 (file)
--- a/nlnet_2022_opf_isa_wg/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/nlnet_2022_opf_isa_wg/discussion.mdwn
@@ -82,14 +82,19 @@ I don't have a problem with that, if you are fine with the extra admin
 work :)  i appreciate it does mean not needing a special EU Auditor,
 and also an opportunity to review, half-way through.
 
+**
     What would work on the legal compliance for the development look
     like? Who would be doing that?
+**
 
-IBM - or more to the point the OPF ISA WG - requesting that all
-contributors sign an "Inbound Patent License Agreement".  in our
+The OpenPOWER Foundation - probably using IBM or LinuxFoundation
+Legal Counsel - requesting that all contributors sign an
+"Inbound Patent License Agreement".  in our
 case there *aren't* any patents, but we still have to sign an
 agreement that there aren't any, and, also, that if we *do* create
 any patents that those will be assigned to the OPF immediately.
+There is also a Copyright Assignment requirement (which IBM also had
+to agree to, now that the Power ISA is owned by the OpenPOWER Foundation)
 Perhaps a budget for some legal assistance in reviewing that agreement
 might be a good idea?  NLnet has funded this work under its
 "Works for the Public Good" mandate: we don't want to be caught out