mv-swizzle could fuse with preceding instruction too

diff --git a/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst b/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst
index f174f7b08cc35878513073130af28774a20b6efd..f0ed748f16bf92b1beea97ee321a8647ee0c736e 100644 (file)
--- a/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst
+++ b/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst
@@ -53,5 +53,5 @@ question: do we need a swizzle MV.X as well?
 macro-op fusion
 ===============
 
-there is the potential for macro-op fusion of mv-swizzle with the following instruction.
+there is the potential for macro-op fusion of mv-swizzle with the following instruction and/or preceding instruction.
 <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/2019-August/002486.html>