From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:24:23 +0000 (+0000) Subject: separate section for meeting X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;h=4b25b84863fae8409388ec99d3bc2a7b3e41be10;p=crowdsupply.git separate section for meeting --- diff --git a/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn b/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn index b70cc96..eb57168 100644 --- a/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn +++ b/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn @@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ funding quite a lot of RISC-V projects, and none of them had any issues. I asked him a very simple question: "how many of those projects are simply *implementing* existing RISC-V Standards?", and he replied, "all of them". I then asked, "how many of those projects are *innovating*, -developing alternative extensions to RISC-V?" That was the point at which +developing alternative extensions to what is dictated by the RISC-V +Foundation?" With the answer being "none", *that* was the point at which he understood the extent of the problem, and how the RISC-V Foundation - and its members - are at risk of violating EU anti-trust legislation.