From f6703dd64c95a90bad8ddb7ff0d03c2abc3eafe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Harlan Lifton Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:36:04 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Remove another metion of RISC-V and promise another update --- updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn b/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn index a589320..ccbf5f4 100644 --- a/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn +++ b/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn @@ -84,13 +84,8 @@ simply *implementing* existing RISC-V Standards?," and he replied, "all of them." I then asked, "how many of those projects are *innovating*, developing alternative extensions to what is dictated by the RISC-V Foundation?" With the answer being "none," *that* was the point at which -he understood the extent of the problem, and (with the systematic failure -to respond to in-good-faith requests to participate in innovation), -how the RISC-V Foundation - and its members, by way of them having -"voting power" and thus having direct influence over how the RISC-V Foundation -is run - are at risk of violating EU anti-trust legislation, particularly -given that NLNet's funds for our project come *directly from an EU Horizon -2020 Grant*. +he understood the extent of the problem. I'll publish a more comprehensive +update on this topic soon. ### Meeting Other LibreSOC People -- 2.30.2