# Libre-RISCV Member Charter Agreement * Draft Status (v0) * Last Edited: 22 Sep 2019 This document is based on the Titanian's "Code of Honour" and on the Systemic Laws of Organisations, listed in "Invisible Dynamics". # The Code of Honour * Always do "good" * Never do "harm" * The Code applies 100% of the time * Everyone knows The Code This Code is simple and short enough to memorise. "Good" is further defined to mean "increasing Truth, Awareness, Love or Creativity for one or more people including yourself" and "Harm" is defined as *reducing* any of those same four qualities for *anyone*. However, The Code on its own, due to its minimalist nature, can be hard to apply when the chips are down, so we further augment it with the Systemic Laws, listed below. Just as with The Code, the Systemic Laws are not optional. # The Systemic Laws of Organisations. The Systemic Laws are based primarily on respect, recognition, responsibility, and ownership of the same; on encouragement and allowing each contributor to grow and be part of the group. * Everyone belongs; every contributor (users included), is recognised both in their own right as well as for their achievements and their contributions. * Everyone is respected and honoured, past and present. * Length of service is respected alongside and in balance with their level of expertise. * Everyone acknowledges and accepts their role and seniority, and in turn acknowledge and accept the role and seniority of others. * The responsibility to those we serve, when we take on a role of responsibility and power, is acknowledged and accepted. * Everyone is rewarded equitably for their contributions. * Everyone is responsible - and accountable - for their actions (good and bad: "Guilt" and "Merit" belong with whoever earned them). The Systemic Laws are explained below. ## Everyone belongs Every contributor and their contributions and achievements are recognised. This further encourages people to contribute; they feel welcome, and their efforts valued. ## Everyone is respected and honoured, past and present When someone leaves a project, particularly under less than ideal circumstances, it is still vitally important to value and respect both them *and* their contributions. ## Role, Seniority and Expertise are all respected. This can be very challenging, particularly when someone with more expertise meets someone whose length of service is greater. ## We accept the responsibility of our position If we choose a position of responsibility, we must actually acknowledge and accept the responsibility of that role! People will be relying on us. ## Everyone is rewarded equitably for their contributions In a "Libre" context this is often extremely hard to do, as the normal rules of profit-maximising business (do not provide goods or services until payment has been received) do not apply: our "product" - the source code - is made available at zero monetary cost. So it is down to us to ensure that part of our time is spent making sure that everyone *is* actually rewarded, whether through contracts, sponsorship, donations, crowd-funding and profit-sharing in the same, and so on. ## Everyone is responsible and accountable (for the "good" *and* the "bad") When we do something well, it is vital that we (alone) own and hold the credit for that achievement (nobody else takes the credit; we *accept* the credit). When we screw up, it is just as equally vital that we take responsibility for cleaning up our mess, and that nobody else is blamed *or think they own it*, or tries to take it the task away from us! In this way, two vitally important things happen. Firstly: we can rely on each other, as we trust that the tasks that others chose will be completed (even if they mess up a few times). Secondly: in our chosen opportunity to grow and learn, we know and trust that nobody will take that away from us, and, further, that our achievements and the credit will be ours.