add short title
[libreriscv.git] / nlnet_2022_ongoing / discussion.mdwn
1 # 20th Sep 2023
2
3 *(Diagram updated: 11th Oct 2023)*
4
5 Current diagram for ongoing grant, no changes made anywhere.
6
7 Bug 961 - NLnet 2022 Libre-SOC "ongoing" milestone 2022-08-107 (approved, MoU TBD) - 100000
8 |
9 |-- (NOT STARTED) Bug 1036 - Formal Proof for LDSTCompUnit is needed - 3000
10 |
11 |-- (DONE) Bug 999 - SFFS Operating System Porting - 10000
12 |
13 |-| (IN PROGRESS) Bug 1003 - instruction database continuation and binutils, SVP64 - 10500
14 | |- (DONE) Bug 1068 - add instructions from ls012 not currently implemented in binutils - 3800
15 | |- (IN PROGRESS) Bug 1079 - make LD/ST-with-update EXTRA3 - 2000
16 | |- (ABSOLUTE TOP PRIORITY TO BE COMPLETED AS ABOLUTE CRITICAL WORK) Bug 1083 - update to DD FFirst Mode binutils PowerDecoder - 700
17 | | Comment #13 REQUESTS cancelling BUT IS DENIED AND NOT AUTHORIZED.
18 | |- (DONE) Bug 1094 - insndb instruction database visitor-walker is needed - 4000
19 |
20 |-- (NOT STARTED) Bug 1024 - Second phase of nmigen Dynamic Partitioned SIMD and nmigen language improvements - 6000
21 |
22 |-| (IN PROGRESS) Bug 1026 - implement Draft Instructions in nmigen HDL - 8000
23 | |- (DONE) Bug 1072 - implement fcvt/fmv instructions in ISACaller (ls006) - 3000
24 | |- Unallocated 5000EUR
25 |
26 |-| (IN PROGRESS) Bug 1027 - implement "necessary" additions to SVP64 and Scalar Power ISA - 24000
27 | |- (CONFIRMED, NOT STARTED) Bug 852 - implement grevlut* - 2000
28 | |- (DONE) Bug 972 - addme/subfme carry/overflow is incorrect - 1000
29 | |- (DONE) Bug 1028 - implement integer-versions of fft/dct "butterfly" instructions in ISACaller Simulator - 4000
30 | |- (DONE) Bug 1030 - Enable compilation of PyPowersim on non-power platforms. - 2000
31 | |- (CONFIRMED, NOT STARTED) Bug 1031 - implement CRweird instructions in ISACaller - 3000
32 | |- (CONFIRMED, NOT STARTED) Bug 1034 - implement crternlogi crbinlut and binlut in ISACaller - 3000
33 | |- (IN PROGRESS) Bug 1047 - SVP64 LD/ST Data-Dependent Fail-First providing linked-list walking - 3000
34 | |- (IN PROGRESS) Bug 1061 - change extsb/h/w definitions to scale input size with XLEN rather than convert from fixed sizes - 1000
35 | |- (DONE) Bug 1064 - Change XLEN-ification - 1000
36 | |- (CONFIRMED, IN PROGRESS) Bug 1071 - add parallel prefix sum remap mode - 2000
37 | |- (CONFIRMED, IN PROGRESS) Bug 1116 - evaluate, spec, and implement Vector-Immediates in SVP64 Normal - 2000
38 |
39 |-- (CONFIRMED, NOT STARTED) Bug 1032 - Implementation of SVP64 features: elwidth overrides and REMAP - 8000
40 |
41 |-- (CONFIRMED, NOT STARTED) Bug 1033 - Implementation and enhancement of "Test API" - 2500
42 |
43 |-| (IN PROGRESS) Bug 1035 - Implement Scalar Power ISA v3.1 (32-bit-only) instructions (no PO1) in ISACaller - 7000
44 | |- (DONE) Bug 1120 - Add all scalar 32-bit v3.1 insns to ISACaller - 2000
45 | |- (CONFIRMED, NOT STARTED) Bug 1147 - support Scalar Power ISA v3.1 (32-bit-only) instructions (no PO1) in binutils - 1000
46 |
47 |-| (CONFIRMED, NOT STARTED) Bug 1037 - improvements of Libre-SOC core support on FPGA boards - 6000
48 | |- (CONFIRMED, IN PROGRESS) Bug 990 - gram needs changes to work on the orangecrab - 4500
49 | |- (CONFIRMED, IN PROGRESS) Bug 1004 - FPGA bring up for platform definitions - 1500
50 |
51 |-- (IN PROGRESS) Bug 1039 - add hardware-cycle-accurate stastistical modelling to ISACaller for an in-order core - 3000
52 |
53 |-- (CONFIRMED, NOT STARTED) Bug 1150 - implement PO9 changeover and associated tasks - 8000
54
55
56 # Meeting 30th aug 2023 16:00 UTC
57
58 * Checked TOML fields and participants in bugs: 961, 1035, 1068, 1083, 1119, 1120, 1123,
59 1146, 1147, 1148
60
61 **TODO**: Check unallocated budget for bugs 737, 1035, 1026. Also check bug 1047 budget
62 allocation.
63
64 # Meeting 30th aug 2023 08:45 UTC
65
66 * Updated the TOML fields for the following bugs: 737, 852, 990, 999, 1004, 1024, 1025,
67 1026, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1039, 1086, 1116, 1120, 1123, 1128, 1130, 1131, 1132
68
69 * If Dmitriy has any more ammendments to make, please check your subtasks (we didn't
70 see any problems).
71
72 * Jacob please update the json file.
73
74 * Luke (once checked with Dmitry and Jacob) please do a final check and submit.
75
76 **TODO**: Dmitry would like to make budget adjustments to
77 [bug #1068](https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1068),
78 a subtask of [bug #1003](https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1003).
79 See the
80 [IRC log](https://libre-soc.org/irclog/%23libre-soc.2023-08-30.log.html#t2023-08-30T11:18:53)
81
82 * A meeting later today will be arranged to make adjustments to the budget.
83
84 Edit:
85
86 * [Bug #1116](https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1116#c7) only needs one person to do the work, so budget allocation adjusted accordingly.
87
88 * Need a discussion on [bug #1047](https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1047#c10), as it also intended to done by one person.
89
90 * Jacob mentioned to re-adjust
91 [bug #1123](https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123#c3) budget to about
92 half of bug #1120. Also Dmitry is not involved in this task (his work will be on a subtask
93 bug #1035).
94
95 # questions 17 aug 2023
96
97 * <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=961#c5>
98
99 ## Discussion from meeting on the 23rd August 2023 21:00 UTC+1
100
101 ### Bug #1003
102
103 * There is no overlap, as #976 tackled a different issue (and was already complete
104 before #1003).
105 * "observe in the child tasks that the entire budget *has* already been allocated to subtasks.... *none of which* overlap (or are a duplicate of) #972"
106 * Bug #1003 does however build on the work from #972.
107 * Added to comment 0 of bug #1003 to clarify that it builds on top of #972.
108
109 **TODO: just put clear message describing task. No "Edit: this etc etc"**
110
111 * Edit: Please see updated [comment 0](https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1003#c0).
112
113 **TODO: 1) the 1st sentence does not mention binutils. 2. it needs to say "continuation of bug #976"
114 3. a "--" is needed. 4. the paragraph "this is an umbrella task" is unnecessary. we already know it's an umbrella task, as it has child
115 subtasks. 5. the last sentence which repeats for the *third* or fourth time "this is a task" can be removed. 6. again "bug #976" not "#976".**
116
117 * Edit: Please see updated [comment 0](https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1003#c0).
118
119 ### Bug #999
120
121 * Build means that Sadoon provides documentation for setting up a SFFS port
122 of Gentoo and Debian.
123 * Stage 3 tar archive file for Gentoo is now available,
124 see [instructions](https://libre-soc.org/SFFS/gentoo_bootstrap/).
125 * Debian scripts are still being worked on as of 23rd Aug.
126 * All files required are hosted either on Libre-SOC's ftp or git.
127 * Patching qemu has been discovered to be out-of-scope for this task
128 (far too much work). Sadoon will be creating (or adding sesction to
129 Gentoo/Debian pages) a wiki page describing the
130 work he went through with qemu.
131
132 **TODO: sadoon, edit the "TODOs" and "DONEs" to include the relevant bugreports.**
133
134 **TODO: sadoon, complete the descriptions in comment zeros of each subtask of #999.**
135
136 * Edit: Sadoon updated comments 0 for bugs #999, 1130, 1131, 1132.
137
138 ### Bugs 1025/1026
139
140 * Jacob is still working on figuring out the subtasks which should be focused
141 on for the scope of the On-Going grant.
142
143 **NOT NEEDED at this stage, can be submitted later. we need to MOVE and get the MoU signed**
144
145 Edit: Jacob specified that 1025/1026 subtasks are not going to be part of
146 the MoU. See
147 [IRC log](https://libre-soc.org/irclog/%23libre-soc.2023-08-24.log.html#t2023-08-24T17:27:20)
148
149 **please REMOVE that. it is NOT necessary to make such a statement.
150 it is already known**
151
152 ### Bug 1032
153
154 * Jacob mentioned there are two major parts
155
156 1. Decoder/fetch pipeline
157 2. Execution unit
158
159 Cesar likely do the former, Jacob could do the latter.
160
161 **CORRECTION: JACOB to do both.**
162
163 * Edit: Please see updated [comment 0](https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1032#c0).
164
165 ### Bug 1033
166
167 * Create the framework for testing (or choose existing)
168 (jacob: important clarification -- afaict this task is adding new `StateRunner`
169 and `State` subclasses for FPGA/verilator/etc.
170 This task is *not* for creating a new framework or choosing an existing framework,
171 we already have one with implementations for pypowersim, nmigen simulation of the
172 libre-soc core, and `ExpectedState`. maybe also QEMU through GDB, icr.)
173 * Add specialisation for pypowersim, microwatt (verilator), FPGA.
174 * Cavatools out of scope.
175 * Builds on top of <https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=openpower-isa.git;a=blob;f=src/openpower/test/state.py;hb=c23202498ae30addf04ab4c1e0d7262cc825cd45>?
176 * Initially pypowersim tested against qemu, then FPGA.
177 * For Simple-V/SVP64 only pypowersim implementation right now.
178 SoC HDL has small subset of SVP64.
179
180
181 ### Automated method for removing non-MOU things
182
183 * Jacob added a feature to automatically remove non-MOU strings.
184
185 **(and didn't follow instructions which was to only add support for "--...--" the standard line-break of markdown). now additional work has to be done looking for the extremely irritating and tiresome and completely undocumented "trigger-sentence" which if typed incorrectly will not do its job)**
186
187 # questions 05 oct 2022
188
189 context is from other [[nlnet_2022_opf_isa_wg/discussion]] on 2022-08-051.
190 mailing list <https://lists.libre-soc.org/pipermail/libre-soc-dev/2022-October/005363.html>
191
192 **
193 Again there should be a breakdown of the main tasks, and the associated effort.
194 And a clarification what rates you used.
195 (I'm assuming these are the same, but I've learned not to assume...)
196 **
197
198 yes EUR 3,000 / mo as a yardstick works out ok in practice.
199
200 tasks, adapted (OpenCAPI is now a secret closed Standard, assigned to a
201 group backed by Intel!)
202
203 * 2-3 months: Dynamic Partitioned SIMD for nmigen
204 * 5-6 months: Continuation of IEEE754 FP Formal Correctness Proofs, addition
205 of FP Rounding Modes and Power ISA Flags
206 * 3-5 months: Completion of an In-Order Single-Issue core implementing SVP64
207 * 3-4 months: Addition of the IEEE754 FPU to the Core
208 * 3-4 months: Addition of other ALUs and pipelines
209 * 4-5 months: Addition of SMP (multi-core) support (lots of research here,
210 need help from IBM / Microwatt, the SMP Memory Model is conprehensive)
211 * 3-4 months: Running under Verilator and on FPGAs (big ones)
212 * 4-5 months: Continued documentation, attendance of Conferences online
213 * 4-5 months: Begin investigating Multi-Issue Out-of-Order
214 * 2-3 months plus hosting costs: Establishment and management of CI
215 * 2? months?: two Bitmain 250 FPGA porting (thanks to UOregon)
216
217 lower estimate is around 35 months, upper limit is 46, so a EUR 100,000
218 budget @ EUR 3,000/mo is within target (just). may need adjusting or some
219 tasks removing, to fit. we cannot risk committing to tasks at too low a
220 rate to be able to attract interest and committment.
221
222 Again however I do not have a problem with reducing the scope of this one
223 to only EUR 50,000 to cover some of the less ambitious tasks, with the
224 necessary infrastructure (Dynamic SIMD, IEEE754 ALUs) being first
225 priority then a second Grant following up to continue.
226
227 **
228 What would be the concrete (high level) outcome of that project -
229 where would the grant get us? Would there be a new test chip made
230 during the lifespan of the project?
231 **
232
233 Answering on the ASIC first: it is a little early to tell. Coriolis2 needs Timing
234 based Routing completed in order to tackle lower geometries (even 90nm),
235 https://libre-soc.org/nlnet_2021_lip6_vlsi/ 2021-08-049.
236 sky130
237 is far too small an allocation (12 mm^2 when we need around 100), we
238 really need sky90 which as i understand is still being negotiated and set up.
239
240 Given the amount of time ls180 took (I have to admit it was a major time-sink for me)
241 as a "learning exercise" the 2019-10-029 project was perfect.
242 However as far as "value for money" is concerned, a repeat is honestly
243 less valuable. That said: when it is ready, RED Semiconductor
244 *will* be picking up the Libre-SOC core and taking it to Silicon
245 (28 nm or below). For this Grant Proposal, powerful FPGAs will
246 get us a long way.
247
248 The concrete outcomes:
249
250 * A greatly increased strategic capacity of nmigen HDL: full Object-Orientated
251 Abstraction of its core Language Features. Opportunities then open up
252 to perform strict type checking, length checking, other types of Arithmetic
253 (Complex numbers, Galois Field) and other "filters" as
254 3rd party extensions, of which the Dynamic SIMD Partitioning Library created under
255 2019-02-012 would be the first big showcase.
256 * A modern well-documented IEEE754 Floating-Point Library, with Formal Correctess
257 Proofs using modern FOSSHW tools (smt2, symbiyosis) is a big deal in its own right,
258 and something worth aiming for.
259 The only
260 other Libre Formal Proof is Academically developed
261 for an older version of IEEE754: we will
262 target 2008 and 2019 semantics.
263 * An actual "on-the-ground" realisation of Simple-V in a useable Core, whereas at
264 present it is Simulations only and the cavatools Cycle-accurate Simulator
265 (2021-08-071) is not quite the same thing (userspace binaries only in cavatools,
266 no Virtual Memory, for a start). SMP Support in particular would be strategically
267 very valuable to have, it greatly expands the commercial viability.
268 * A lot larger "eat own dogfood" hosting solution, the NGI POINTER Grant paid for
269 an IBM POWER9 Server which lends us credibility but it needs to be put to
270 good use!
271
272 In other words, mostly "low-level strategic outcomes" on the way to success :)