separate section for meeting
[crowdsupply.git] / updates / 022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn
1 # Intro
2
3 Several things in this update: the OpenPower Foundation released their
4 EULA (which is really exciting); RISC-V Foundation opens access to
5 *some* mailing lists (but doesn't tackle the important stuff); we had
6 a last-minute decision to go to FOSDEM to meet NLNet (and meet lots
7 of nice people including someone from the EU Commission); we have new team
8 members helping out (and making really good progress).
9
10 # OpenPOWER Foundation releases the Power ISA EULA
11
12 This is a big deal: the
13 [EULA](https://openpowerfoundation.org/final-draft-of-the-power-isa-eula-released/)
14 for anyone wishing to create a Power ISA compatible processor, it's been
15 designed to be "libre-friendly". We will need to do a full review,
16 and would appreciate feedback on it, via
17 [this bugreport](http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179).
18 A very quick read (like, right now): the really interesting bit is the
19 combination of a royalty-free grant (as long as you are fully
20 compliant with Power ISA) in combination with "if you initiate
21 patent litigation, you lose all rights immediately". This provides an
22 extremely strong disincentive for patent trolls to "try it on". It also
23 actively encourages contributors to make sure that their work becomes an
24 "official" part of Power, because that then gets them under the
25 "umbrella" of protection as part of this EULA.
26
27 My only concern - long-term - is the warning about Custom Extensions
28 potentially being incompatible. We remember the Altivec clash very
29 well, citing it as a historic lesson "How Not To Manage An ISA",
30 because both Altivec's vector extension and the one it clashed
31 with became high-profile public wide-spread common-usage extensions,
32 and it damaged Power ISA's entire reputation and viability as a result.
33
34 With our extensions being designed *knowingly* in advance to be
35 high-profile, public, wide-spread and common-usage, we absolutely have
36 to submit them as "official" extensions, or to work with the Open Power
37 Foundation to create an official "escape-sequence" namespace system
38 (ISAMUX/ISANS). As mentioned previously: anyone familiar with c++,
39 we need a hardware version of "using namespace", in its entirety.
40
41 First preliminary reading however, as Hugh kindly said privately to me,
42 there's really nothing controversial, here, and it actually looks really
43 good and extremely well-designed.
44
45 # RISC-V Mailing Lists
46
47 By complete contrast to how OpenPower is being managed...
48
49 Since the last update, some of the RISC-V Mailing lists have become "open".
50 There was no announcement. You can't get access to the prior archives.
51 Critically important lists - such as the UNIX Platform Working Group -
52 remain closed and secretive. Four years of requests by dozens of people
53 to not be "Fake Open Source". It's like pulling teeth without an anaesthetic.
54 Still, they're finally making an effort.
55
56 They still have not responded (as is legally required under their Trademark
57 obligations) to any of the twenty to thirty very deliberately public,
58 prominent, and reasonable in-good-faith
59 requests for inclusion in the *innovation* of RISC-V (not just its
60 "use", its **innovation**) by Libre Businesses with "full transparency"
61 as part of their core business objectives.
62
63 Failing to allow public participation in the UNIX WG is particularly
64 damaging to RISC-V's reputation. Telling u-boot and linux kernel developers
65 "oh if you want to contribute to RISC-V kernel or u-boot you have to sign
66 a secret agreement and sign up to a secretive mailing list", how well do you
67 think that's going to go down?
68
69 I really don't want to be the only person informing people about how
70 RISC-V is still "Fake Open Source" and how it's effectively cartelled
71 (and is running afoul of anti-trust laws). If someone else can take over
72 responsibility for this, I'd much prefer to keep the LibreSOC a positive,
73 welcoming and progressive community.
74
75 # FOSDEM 2020
76
77 As mentioned
78 [on the list](http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/2020-January/003660.html)
79 we received a message from Michiel that they were financially backing over
80 *twenty five* projects that were attending and giving talks at FOSDEM!
81 They also let everyone know that the nice people from Brussels were going
82 to be attending. At which point, I went, "ah." and scrambled like mad to
83 make sure I was there, presenting a smiling face to ensure that the nice
84 EU Commission people knew that their money was definitely being put to good
85 use.
86
87 This actually turns out to be a serious problem for the EU. My friend Phil
88 decided a few years ago to go along to one of these "Independent Grant Review"
89 processes. He basically said that not only was the quality of the applications
90 absolutely atrocious, but worse than that the people volunteering to do the
91 review - ordinary people like solicitors, office managers, farmers - had
92 precisely zero technical knowledge and couldn't tell the difference between
93 a good application, a bad application or a deceptive application.
94
95 Now expand that up to applications for EUR 1 million. 10 million.
96
97 Consequently, for NLNet to be actually making sure that the money they've
98 been given responsibility for actually reaches actual programmers who
99 actually release actual free software which actually improves actual
100 real-world infrastructure for the benefit of EU Citizens (and incidentally
101 the rest of the world) is a bit of an eye-opener.
102
103 I had a brief chat with the person from the EU Commission. He was
104 delighted to be able to see the sheer number of people involved and being
105 sponsored by NLNet. I had an opportunity to ask him about the anti-trust
106 aspects of the RISC-V Foundation's ongoing intransigent behaviour.
107 He initially expressed puzzlement and some concern, because the EU is
108 funding quite a lot of RISC-V projects, and none of them had any issues.
109 I asked him a very simple question: "how many of those projects are
110 simply *implementing* existing RISC-V Standards?", and he replied, "all
111 of them". I then asked, "how many of those projects are *innovating*,
112 developing alternative extensions to what is dictated by the RISC-V
113 Foundation?" With the answer being "none", *that* was the point at which
114 he understood the extent of the problem, and how the RISC-V Foundation -
115 and its members - are at risk of violating EU anti-trust legislation.
116
117 oops.
118
119 # Meeting other LibreSOC people
120
121 It was fantastic to meet Staf, and talk to him about the upcoming
122 test chip that he'll be doing. He will be including an SR-Latch cell for
123 us, because it saves such a vast number of gates in the Dependency
124 Matrices if we use a D-Flip-Flop: 50,000 gates if we use an SR-Latch,
125 and a *quarter of a million* if we use a DFF.
126
127 There were several other
128 people we met, including one who can help us to develop a
129 [BSP](http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164) (Board Support Package).
130 Also we got a chance to talk to several other people with cross-over skillsets.
131
132 This alone was worth the time to go to FOSDEM, this year. Now what
133 we have to do is make sure to plan properly in advance, to put in some
134 papers at appropriate conferences. We really need to organise a proper
135 conference where everyone meets up.
136
137 # New members
138
139 We created an [about us](http://libre-riscv.org/about_us)
140 page for members (if you'd like to help do just sign up)
141
142 We have now four new people who are contributing: Cole, Veera, Yehowshua
143 and Michael. Veera is a sysadmin and I would be delighted to get some
144 help managing the server. In particular I would like to install public-inbox
145 but it requires exim4 and mailman to be converted to Maildir. This is
146 the kind of thing that would be great to hand over to another sysadmin.
147
148 Cole just loves the idea of what we're doing and wants to learn, so what
149 I've asked him to do is to simply follow instructions and tutorials, and
150 give us feedback on whether they're clear. If not, that's a problem that
151 needs to be fixed, and, contrary to expectations, it's precisely his
152 *lack* of experience is absolutely perfect for testing that.
153
154 Yehowshua - a friend of Michael - got in touch around the time of the
155 last update, and he's been helping find funding. As he is at Georgia Tech,
156 he will be applying for the LAUNCH-X Programme, funded initially by my
157 old boss, Chris Klaus. Chris has been really helpful here, he's really
158 delighted to be able to help other Georgia Tech Alumni. Yehowshua has
159 also been encouraging and helping with a redesign of the website CSS,
160 and been instrumental in a major rewrite of the wording.
161
162 Michael has just jumped straight in to the processor design. Yehowshua
163 tells me he first met Michael as he was sitting in a cafe with an FPGA
164 board attached to his laptop. He's another of these extremely rare
165 self-motivated, self-taught, "auto-learner" types who are worth their
166 weight in gold. He's currently helping with the
167 [Dynamic SIMD partitioner](http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132)
168 which we will need to do a special update about, at some point.
169
170 One particularly fascinating common theme between all of us turns out
171 to be music, maths, and high-coordination sports. Yehowshua loves
172 skate-boarding, and I love rollerblading, for example.
173
174 One very interesting thing came out of the contact with Georgia Tech's
175 CREATE-X Programme: we are looking to create a Public Benefit Corporation.
176 More on this later, however it became clear to us that we need good
177 "communicators". Not so much more "programmers", although we do still
178 urgently need a c++ compiler type person for the
179 [MESA 3D Driver](https://libre-riscv.org/nlnet_2019_amdvlk_port/).
180 We need entrepreneurs - especially undergraduates from Georgia Tech - willing
181 to take on the responsibility for going out and finding, meeting and talking to
182 clients and customers, coming up with ideas, and giving us, as "Engineers",
183 the feedback we need to target the processor at an actual market.
184
185 # Other stuff
186
187 The extra NLNet budgets are helping, as is the continued sponsorship from
188 Purism. I am beginning to get slightly overloaded with the managerial and
189 bureaucratic tasks, combined with the "Engineering" tasks that, as is always
190 the case, require 100% sustained week-long focus.
191
192 These two (three? four? five?) things are clearly incompatible. whoops.
193
194 I still have to coordinate the NLNet tasks for each of the Memorandums
195 of Understanding, at which point the tasks listed on them, people can
196 then get paid for completing them. I can't quite get over the fact that
197 NLNet was happy to allocate such a huge amount of money to this project,
198 it's amazing, humbling, and a huge responsibility.
199
200 Also, we got word that the 180nm tape-outs (one in March 2020, one in October
201 2020) are actually subsidised. In addition, we have *verbal* informal
202 confirmation that some proprietary cell libraries are about to be
203 announced as being libre-licensed. This is particularly fascinating.
204
205 Reading between the lines, we can surmise / hypothesise that various
206 "noises" about how hardware is proprietary and how difficult it is to
207 do Libre / Open ASICs (people basically give up and don't even bother
208 because it's so ridiculously costly, no one individual Libre / Open
209 ASIC developer could possibly imagine themselves contributing to,
210 let alone raising the multi-million funds for, say, a
211 4 GHz 10-stage 12-core SMP multi-issue processor, so they don't
212 even bother to design or release anything that *could* be part of
213 such a design), and consequently it looks like various large companies
214 who shall remain nameless for now are quietly and subtly waving around
215 very large amounts of cash in front of the noses of Foundries, tempting
216 them to release things like Cell Libraries under Libre Licenses.
217
218 Given that the U.S. Trade War has recently caused a whopping
219 **twelve percent** drop in
220 [ASIC sales](https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/20/02/07/2157253/chip-industry-had-worst-sales-year-since-dot-com-bubble-burst),
221 with USA ASIC sales dropping **twenty four percent**,
222 they're probably "quite open" shall we say to large up-front cash deals.
223
224 Anyway, as always, if you'd like to help out (and actually receive money
225 for doing so), we have a nice shiny new section
226 [on the website](https://libre-riscv.org/), "How can i help?" and there
227 is a heck of a lot to do. Feel free to get in touch, any time.
228