-* The deadline is really tight. If an FPGA (or simulation) plus the basics of the software driver are at least prototyped by then it *might* be ok.
-* If using Nyuzi as the basis it *might* be possible to begin the software port in parallel because Jeff went to the trouble of writing a cycle-accurate simulation.
-* I *suspect* it will result in less work to use Gallium3D than, for example, writing an entire OpenGL stack from scratch.
-* A *demo* should run on an FPGA as an initial. The FPGA is not a priority for assessment, but it would be *nice* if
-it could fit into a ZC706.
-* Also if there is parallel hardware obviously it would be nice to be able to demonstrate parallelism to the maximum extend possible. But again, being reasonable, if the GPU is so big that only a single core can fit into even a large FPGA then for an initial demo that would be fine.
-* Note that no other licenses are acceptable. GPLv2+ is out.
+* The deadline is really tight. If an FPGA (or simulation) plus the basics
+ of the software driver are at least prototyped by then it *might* be ok.
+* If using Nyuzi as the basis it *might* be possible to begin the
+ software port in parallel because Jeff went to the trouble of writing
+ a cycle-accurate simulation.
+* I *suspect* it will result in less work to use Gallium3D than, for
+ example, writing an entire OpenGL stack from scratch.
+* A *demo* should run on an FPGA as an initial. The FPGA is not a priority
+ for assessment, but it would be *nice* if it could fit into a ZC706.
+* Also if there is parallel hardware obviously it would be nice to be able
+ to demonstrate parallelism to the maximum extend possible. But again,
+ being reasonable, if the GPU is so big that only a single core can fit
+ into even a large FPGA then for an initial demo that would be fine.
+* Note that no other licenses are acceptable for the hardware: all GPL
+ licenses (GPL, AGPL, LGPL) are out. GPL (all revisions v2, v3, v2+, v3+)
+ are out for software, with the exception of the LGPL (v2+ or v3+ acceptable).