Part of the process was a little tricky, initially: the independent reviewers
expressed surprise at the amounts being requested for *sub*-tasks when the
-initial application was so small. The reason was very simple: both Jacob
+initial application back in December 2019 was so small, relative to
+the intended goal. The reason was very simple: both Jacob
and I have unique low-income circumstances that simply do not need European /
Western style living expenses. Whereas, when we get to much more specialist
tasks (such as formal mathematical proofs, video assembly-level drivers,
ISA itself, it's the abuse of power and the flagrant ignoring and abuse
of basic tenets of trademark law that are just completely untenable.
Not only that: one well-paid employee of SiFive has *repeatedly* engaged
-in defamation attacks for over eighteen months, even raising a formal
+in defamation attacks for over eighteen months. Even raising a formal
complaint through the newly-established relationship with the Linux
Foundation failed to keep that individual under control. Also adversely
impacted was the newly-established Open Graphics Alliance initiative,
good and necessary thing. With this **formally** in place as part
of an officially-approved Power ISA Standard, not only could our team
expand the Power ISA in a safe and controlled fashion, so could other
- adopters.
+ adopters of the Power ISA.
* that the core OpenPower members had *already been discussing* how to make
sure that new Libre teams with a commercial focus could join and not
have any transparency / patent / NDA / royalty / licensing conflicts