ISA itself, it's the abuse of power and the flagrant ignoring and abuse
of basic tenets of trademark law that are just completely untenable.
Not only that: one well-paid employee of SiFive has *repeatedly* engaged
-in defamation attacks for over eighteen months, even raising a formal
+in defamation attacks for over eighteen months. Even raising a formal
complaint through the newly-established relationship with the Linux
Foundation failed to keep that individual under control. Also adversely
impacted was the newly-established Open Graphics Alliance initiative,
good and necessary thing. With this **formally** in place as part
of an officially-approved Power ISA Standard, not only could our team
expand the Power ISA in a safe and controlled fashion, so could other
- adopters.
+ adopters of the Power ISA.
* that the core OpenPower members had *already been discussing* how to make
sure that new Libre teams with a commercial focus could join and not
have any transparency / patent / NDA / royalty / licensing conflicts
- of interest. The only major thing that the other members wanted was
- a "public relations blackout period," right around the time of announcement of
- new standards, which sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
+ of interest. The only major thing that the other members particularly
+ wanted was a "public relations blackout period," right around the time
+ of announcement of new standards, which sounds perfectly reasonable
+ to me.
* that IBM will be providing a royalty-free unlimited license grant
for *all* of its patents, as long as firstly the licensees do not
make any effort to assert patents **against** IBM, and secondly,
projects / crowdsupply.git / blobdiff