add clarification

[libreriscv.git] / shakti / m_class / libre_3d_gpu.mdwn

diff --git a/shakti/m_class/libre_3d_gpu.mdwn b/shakti/m_class/libre_3d_gpu.mdwn
index 05ecef8eaf2aef3717a97fcffdcc2c4650883dbb..35a663e9129e5393502d36f1a83ed4f16bb24f6e 100644 (file)
--- a/shakti/m_class/libre_3d_gpu.mdwn
+++ b/shakti/m_class/libre_3d_gpu.mdwn
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ same silicon area).
 ## Other
 
 * The deadline is about 12-18 months.
-* It is highly recommended to use Gallium3D for the software stack.
+* It is highly recommended to use Gallium3D for the software stack
+  (see below if deciding whether to use Nyuzi or RISC-V or other)
 * Software must be licensed under LGPLv2+ or BSD/MIT.
 * Hardware (RTL) must be licensed under BSD or MIT with no
   "NON-COMMERCIAL" CLAUSES.
@@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ As I mention in the above page, one of the problems with doing a completely sepa
 
 Will that approach work? Honestly I have absolutely no idea, but it would be a fascinating and extremely ambitious research project.
 
-Can we get people to fund it?  Yeah I do.  there's a lot of buzz about RISC-V, and a lot of buzz can be created about a libre 3D GPU. If that same GPU happens to be good at doing crypto-currency mining there will be a LOT more attention paid, particularly given that people have noticed that relying on proprietary GPUs and CPUs to manage billions of dollars worth of crypto-currency, when the NSA is *known* to have blackmailed intel into putting a spying back-door co-processor in to x86, and that it miiight not be a good idea to trust proprietary hardware
+Can we get people to fund it?  Yeah I do.  there's a lot of buzz about RISC-V, and a lot of buzz can be created about a libre 3D GPU. If that same GPU happens to be good at doing crypto-currency mining there will be a LOT more attention paid, particularly given that people have noticed that relying on proprietary GPUs and CPUs to manage billions of dollars worth of crypto-currency, when the NSA is *known* to have blackmailed intel into putting a spying back-door co-processor in to x86, and that it miiight not be a good idea to trust proprietary hardware:
 
 <http://libreboot.org/faq#intelme>
 
@@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ A:
 That would be fantastic as it would demonstrate not only competence but also commitment. And will have taken out the "risk" of being "unknown", entirely. So that works perfectly for me :) .
 
 > Q:
+>
 > Is there any guarantee that there would be a sponsorship for the GPU?
 
 A: